We could start exploring the colors
and shades of gray in the same manner we did with previous subjects - the
main question being in the relation of a medium with reality it represents:
sorting out the combination of similarities and differences between the
two usually makes one aware of what is essential about the medium itself.
This procedure also yields an estimated abstraction level characteristic
for the medium, so we'd end up reasoning how the color certainly brings
up new creative possibilities, but on the other side it lowers that abstraction
level - making everything closer to reality.
That business being done, let's indulge in a far more satisfying comparison:
of the perception of color vs. shape. The sole act of perceiving
a shape depends on an active approach, moving on the conscious and rational
plane (no matter where final effect takes place, mind you), and it has
been attributed with masculinity. Perception of color, on the other hand,
has something feminine about it, as it happens in passive surrender, and
even in the first perceptual stages already communicates with our subconscious
and intuitive. We have to stress again that this concerns only the primary
physiological facts - not much open for interpretation, so that an inclination
towards color does tell about the character of the person so inclined.
From this observation, we have to realize the possibility of endless and
inspired flow of color descriptions which could result in an impractical
quantity of words, pages or even books: we are talking about a full spectrum
of symbols with an unimaginable capacity. However, a strict organization
into essence is equally impossible (for the opposite, qualitative reason).
So trapped, let's just go for a little personal walk - from the "bottom"
part of the spectrum.
The pure red color, uncontaminated by yellow, has the attributes
of huge, but controlled energy in a static shape - without apparent expansion
or contraction, movement towards or away from the eye. The borders of red
object are very strong, keeping the burning power in natural discipline.
Going ever so slightly towards yellow, thru the orange-red, with
the peak in reddish-orange, what happens is the barrage of phenomena usually
attributed to the warm part of a spectrum. All of these colors are aggressively
expanding and moving towards the viewer, bathing us in radiance of warmth
with no much concern for anything, the least being it's origin. This is
the dispersion of extroversion. In the analogy of shapes and colors (by
Bauhaus), red is fitted with the shape of circle; for the yellow,
appropriate is the triangle, the most dynamic shape, also suggesting the
division point. For in the cold, poor, gaunt yellow (appearing a tad green),
the beginning of cold spectrum can be sensed. This whole part of spectrum
towards the green corresponds greatly with mental diseases, since
the introvert blue is disturbed by the neurotic content of yellow - matching
the internal conflicts of the burdened and hermetic mind. More we approach
the blue, more that neurosis becomes controlled. Blue is completely
cold, peaceful and serene color, inspiring thought. "A delightful nothing"
(Goethe), blue concentrically retires into itself and away from us - into
the concentration and foundation. It responds to shape of a square, settled
and stabile, and symbolizes the absolute introversion and spiritual clarity.
At the end of spectrum, in violet, a completely different energy
can be found (oddly opposite to green in the psychological sense), with
a lot in common with magical and transcendent. This light but penetrative
color may owe its powers to connecting the ends - blue and red, being exactly
an octave higher (of double frequency) from red, and inheriting some of
its mystical strength.
What I forgot to mention is how these (personal, did we say) walks
have little exactness, if only because of the incompatibility of language
and color (just proves that result can only reach as far as free rambling).
It is still easier to write about the shape...
A quick answer will set the black and white image to be an opposite
of color. However, that still doesn't free the ground for the pure action
of shapes. The scale of gray tones hides a surprising kinship with the
color spectrum.
A lot of these similarities are quite subtle, so we can hardly notice
much of contraction and expansion, or especially appearance of intro- or
extroversion; even the impressions of cold and warm are more contextual
here. However, the emotional effects of tones still depend on minute shade
changes - sometimes a slightly darker photograph feels entirely different.
It wouldn't be possible to go through all these tones our eye (and heart)
differentiates, not only because of their number, but also because here,
unlike with color spectrum where we can refer to particular color and be
universally recognized, we don't even have some conventions to use as firm
rungs of the ladder. For that reason, let's try just an overall description. Low
tones appears to be inwardly closed, shaded and fit for mystification.
There is a feeling of an exhale, warmth, and greater weight in the saturation
with black. This ends in black, which hides its content, forcing us to
imagine the worlds beneath its unpenetrable solid, all in a vivid and clear
impression of passive viewer, so characteristic for perception of colors.
Black feels like a silence after the music; white responds to a pause within
it (Kandinsky).
In contrast, white is an extreme explicitness, like daylight, so high
tones have the impression of an inhale, light materiality with a certain
fragility, accessibility, and, conditionally, coldness. As far as the movement
towards and away from the eye, there are contradictions: ambivalence is
available for use - again depending on the context. The idea of light's
nature inspires the feeling of highlights approaching, shadows departing.
This is in contradiction with aerial perspective, where haze makes distance
light, or with some other aspects of perceiving tones (such as the tactility
of dark and transcendence of light). Distinction between our subject and
the background will help set the direction in many practical cases (letters
standing on a top of a white paper), even though the dark image often seems
"inset" into the white wall. The old cinematic rule that a light background
contributes to the feeling of depth has different grounds: it is because the background is coming forth that we notice the spatial arrangement to
begin with. Yin - Yang theory also fights against: it understands dark
to be active - we can only explain it as an illustration of its specific
thought. There is definitely a contradictory thinking going here at some
wholesale prices. However, this is not the same dialectic the other mentioned
elements of composition carry within: these are simply impressions subtle
enough to succumb to a variety of outside influences and interpretations.
Knowing those outside factors will help us clean up and get to the meaning
of tones themselves. |