We could start exploring the colors and shades of gray in the same manner we did with previous subjects - the main question being in the relation of a medium with reality it represents: sorting out the combination of similarities and differences between the two usually makes one aware of what is essential about the medium itself. This procedure also yields an estimated abstraction level characteristic for the medium, so we'd end up reasoning how the color certainly brings up new creative possibilities, but on the other side it lowers that abstraction level - making everything closer to reality.

That business being done, let's indulge in a far more satisfying comparison: of the perception of color vs. shape. The sole act of perceiving a shape depends on an active approach, moving on the conscious and rational plane (no matter where final effect takes place, mind you), and it has been attributed with masculinity. Perception of color, on the other hand, has something feminine about it, as it happens in passive surrender, and even in the first perceptual stages already communicates with our subconscious and intuitive. We have to stress again that this concerns only the primary physiological facts - not much open for interpretation, so that an inclination towards color does tell about the character of the person so inclined. From this observation, we have to realize the possibility of endless and inspired flow of color descriptions which could result in an impractical quantity of words, pages or even books: we are talking about a full spectrum of symbols with an unimaginable capacity. However, a strict organization into essence is equally impossible (for the opposite, qualitative reason). So trapped, let's just go for a little personal walk - from the "bottom" part of the spectrum.
The pure red color, uncontaminated by yellow, has the attributes of huge, but controlled energy in a static shape - without apparent expansion or contraction, movement towards or away from the eye. The borders of red object are very strong, keeping the burning power in natural discipline. Going ever so slightly towards yellow, thru the orange-red, with the peak in reddish-orange, what happens is the barrage of phenomena usually attributed to the warm part of a spectrum. All of these colors are aggressively expanding and moving towards the viewer, bathing us in radiance of warmth with no much concern for anything, the least being it's origin. This is the dispersion of extroversion. In the analogy of shapes and colors (by Bauhaus), red is fitted with the shape of circle; for the yellow, appropriate is the triangle, the most dynamic shape, also suggesting the division point. For in the cold, poor, gaunt yellow (appearing a tad green), the beginning of cold spectrum can be sensed. This whole part of spectrum towards the green corresponds greatly with mental diseases, since the introvert blue is disturbed by the neurotic content of yellow - matching the internal conflicts of the burdened and hermetic mind. More we approach the blue, more that neurosis becomes controlled. Blue is completely cold, peaceful and serene color, inspiring thought. "A delightful nothing" (Goethe), blue concentrically retires into itself and away from us - into the concentration and foundation. It responds to shape of a square, settled and stabile, and symbolizes the absolute introversion and spiritual clarity. At the end of spectrum, in violet, a completely different energy can be found (oddly opposite to green in the psychological sense), with a lot in common with magical and transcendent. This light but penetrative color may owe its powers to connecting the ends - blue and red, being exactly an octave higher (of double frequency) from red, and inheriting some of its mystical strength.

What I forgot to mention is how these (personal, did we say) walks have little exactness, if only because of the incompatibility of language and color (just proves that result can only reach as far as free rambling). It is still easier to write about the shape...

A quick answer will set the black and white image to be an opposite of color. However, that still doesn't free the ground for the pure action of shapes. The scale of gray tones hides a surprising kinship with the color spectrum.

A lot of these similarities are quite subtle, so we can hardly notice much of contraction and expansion, or especially appearance of intro- or extroversion; even the impressions of cold and warm are more contextual here. However, the emotional effects of tones still depend on minute shade changes - sometimes a slightly darker photograph feels entirely different. It wouldn't be possible to go through all these tones our eye (and heart) differentiates, not only because of their number, but also because here, unlike with color spectrum where we can refer to particular color and be universally recognized, we don't even have some conventions to use as firm rungs of the ladder. For that reason, let's try just an overall description. Low tones appears to be inwardly closed, shaded and fit for mystification. There is a feeling of an exhale, warmth, and greater weight in the saturation with black. This ends in black, which hides its content, forcing us to imagine the worlds beneath its unpenetrable solid, all in a vivid and clear impression of passive viewer, so characteristic for perception of colors. Black feels like a silence after the music; white responds to a pause within it (Kandinsky).

In contrast, white is an extreme explicitness, like daylight, so high tones have the impression of an inhale, light materiality with a certain fragility, accessibility, and, conditionally, coldness. As far as the movement towards and away from the eye, there are contradictions: ambivalence is available for use - again depending on the context. The idea of light's nature inspires the feeling of highlights approaching, shadows departing. This is in contradiction with aerial perspective, where haze makes distance light, or with some other aspects of perceiving tones (such as the tactility of dark and transcendence of light). Distinction between our subject and the background will help set the direction in many practical cases (letters standing on a top of a white paper), even though the dark image often seems "inset" into the white wall. The old cinematic rule that a light background contributes to the feeling of depth has different grounds: it is because the background is coming forth that we notice the spatial arrangement to begin with. Yin - Yang theory also fights against: it understands dark to be active - we can only explain it as an illustration of its specific thought. There is definitely a contradictory thinking going here at some wholesale prices. However, this is not the same dialectic the other mentioned elements of composition carry within: these are simply impressions subtle enough to succumb to a variety of outside influences and interpretations. Knowing those outside factors will help us clean up and get to the meaning of tones themselves.

color and tone

The mood of this image is largely determined by the tonality of wall and shadow. Both can obviously be controlled by varying contrast and brightness while enlarging. The darker midtones here describe a gentle tired flow from left to right, with the particular inclination towards our small white spot.
 
 


Precise tonality is important because it determines the character of the whole surface. It was necessary to be very cautious with just how dark tones may be allowed on this wall, to preserve the feeling of sharp and brittle delicacy (somewhat in the contradiction with the wall material itself).